Thanks to the rapid advancement of technology, personal cameras have become affordable and ubiquitous that anyone can make a film easily. Although many people are concerned about the negative effects of this trend, I have an optimistic view of it, and I will explain why.
With the popularity of compact cameras and smartphones that allow people to film anything they want, some are afraid that their privacy can be blatantly violated. If a film whose sensitive or confidential content is leaked to the public, it is likely to become a catastrophe for the owners. Besides, the excessive availability of private films is worrying many parents because they can distract children from their studies and hinder their healthy cognitive development. For example, hatred and violent contents that are extremely easy to be widespread can influence young people, indirectly increasing the rate of juvenile offenders. In all likelihood, the popularity of homemade films in such cases is negative, and the consequences are significant.
Nonetheless, I am convinced that the increasing prevalence of private films is a positive phenomenon, and the benefits even outweigh its drawbacks. Firstly, shooting films itself is a fascinating and utterly harmless activity, allowing us to keep memorable moments of our lives, our family members and everything around us. Furthermore, students and teachers can make films or video clips to supplement their classroom presentations or to enhance self-study or distance learning. More interestingly, the rapid development of social networking sites such as YouTube, Facebook and Instagram, coupled with high income from advertising activities, has boosted the enthusiasm of many amateur filmmakers. As a result, the hobby has evolved into a promising opportunity for creative people to earn money.
To conclude, not only has making films no longer been the sole privilege of big companies, but it has also become a positive trend that many individuals can enjoy, or even allows some to make a fortune or influencers on the Internet.
- In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think it is a positive or negative situation 67
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? To what extent do you support this development? 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 92
- People who do not use social media networks will always fall behind in career development opportunities To what extent do you feel that this is an accurate and important prediction 90
- Some people believe that government should take care of old people and provide financial support after they retire Others say individual should save during their working years to fund their own retirement What is your opinion Give reasons for your answer 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nonetheless, so, thus, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44859813084 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03835913708 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623052959502 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6980321289 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.538461538 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22057869448 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737260800978 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472774395899 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141390073881 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304995317979 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nonetheless, so, thus, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44859813084 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03835913708 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623052959502 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6980321289 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.538461538 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22057869448 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737260800978 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472774395899 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141390073881 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304995317979 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.