Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative

Essay topics:

Films were produced by big companies in the past, but today people are able to make a film. Do you think this trend is positive or negative?

Along with the ever innovation in technology, filmmaking is no longer exclusive to giant company any more since individuals and small companies can make considerable contribution to this section too. From my perspective, this trend bears both merits and demerits.

It is widely regard that the advancement of Internet and digital technology has brought more opportunities to those apart from major companies. First and foremost, with the introduction of smartphones, computers, personal digital cameras and editing apps, it is no longer necessary for film-maker to have high budget and a big crew to produce a film. Even in some cases, a smartphone is the only thing required to shoot and edit videos since technologies has enable them to captured high-quality scenes and the availability of free video-sharing platform such as Youtube and Facebook, resulted in easier accessible for many young and amateur film-makers.

Moreover, as it is getting more feasible for people to make films, a lengthy process commonly seen in big film productions, from submitting the script to getting approval from the producers and the sponsors, could be avoided. As a result, more movie plots, even those that have been previously rejected by major film productions, can be made into production and featured to the general public.It is not to mentioned that the explosion of individual film makers lay strong emphasis on film’s artistic and content aspects rather than making profits. Such growth in independent films not only can offers diverse choices and original content to film-watchers but also promote the development of cinematography.

On the other hand, it is undeniable that the lack of strict regulations in individual film-making process has resulted in low-quality films with inappropriate contents such as: violence, religious bias, unauthentic information which will have a detrimental effects on viewers, especially children as these films are easily accessed through the Internet.

In conclusion, the inclusive of small business and individuals in the film industry along with major company have both advantages and drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-16 hieu13092006 67 view
2023-07-16 hieu13092006 67 view
2022-08-19 fanncia99 78 view
2021-12-14 perry1812 78 view
2021-09-22 Le Bich Diep 56 view
Essays by user nhattram39 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'enabled'.
Suggestion: enabled
... and edit videos since technologies has enable them to captured high-quality scenes an...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ade into production and featured to the general public.It is not to mentioned that the explosi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...tion and featured to the general public.It is not to mentioned that the explosion ...
^^
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'offer'
Suggestion: offer
...rowth in independent films not only can offers diverse choices and original content to...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, moreover, so, then, apart from, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in some cases, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53658536585 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0880986042 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612804878049 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.8090433077 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.6 106.682146367 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8 20.7667163134 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254292503902 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100068359732 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464486778305 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134722640417 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395508400476 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.0946893788 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.