The first man to walk on the moon claimed it was a step forward for mankind However it has made little difference in most people s lives

Indubitably, there are several changes in an individual’s lifestyle after Neil Armstrong landed on the moon. It is often argued that country leaders give ample amount of funds to space research organizations for exploring outer space instead of funding to world life foundation companies. However, I partially agree with this given notion.

Apparently, space explorations hold a wide range of constructive benefits for humankind. To begin with, the major improvements made in technology after certain advancements, especially in telecommunication. For example, a microphone such as a walkie-talkie was created for astronauts to communicate with each other while traveling in space for researching new species like ‘aliens’ and chances of new life. Secondly, artificial satellites have been created to predict the weather forecast, which mostly revolves around Earth.

Moreover, it is necessary to research for life on other planets to create space colonies because of the rapidly growing population which is uncontrollable might be trouble for humans to consume space for living on our home planet. Conversely, walking on the moon and other planets requires a huge amount of investment but, this research has been beneficial to humans, especially in the technological world. However, this research consumes money and time in exploring new things but, it solves impossible problems which are unexpected for people.

To recapitulate, although funds are required for space explorations, such visits should be continued to invent wonders as this would be better for future mankind.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...bitably there are several changes in an individuals lifestyle after Neil Armstrong landed o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecast which mostly revolves around Earth Moreover it is necessary to research for...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... which mostly revolves around Earth Moreover it is necessary to research for life on...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns especially in the technological world However this research consumes money and...
^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...problems which are unexpected for people To recapitulate although funds are requi...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, conversely, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 238.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54621848739 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01359816267 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626050420168 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 238.0 20.2975951904 1173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1320.0 106.682146367 1237% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 238.0 20.7667163134 1146% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 116.0 7.06120827912 1643% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162829664378 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162829664378 0.084324248473 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948083195183 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270383761866 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 123.7 13.0946893788 945% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -187.01 50.2224549098 -372% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 98.5 11.3001002004 872% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.39 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 20.42 8.58950901804 238% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 63.0 9.78957915832 644% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 97.2 10.1190380762 961% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 63.0 10.7795591182 584% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.