The food travels thousands miles form farm to consumers. Some people think it would be better to our environment and economy if people only ate only locally produced food. To what extent do advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
Nowadays, different types of food become more popular. Some people think it is not good for the economy and nature. If people start to eat locally produced food, which will right for the nation, while others argue that. This essay will discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of the argument and why it is good for everyone, all the explanations described in the following paragraphs.
Many countries allow foreign companies to sell their food products in their local markets, which may be more advantageous for everyone. Firstly, it can help in the economy. If countries give permission to international companies to sell their food-related products, which will create more job opportunities and people will have different options in products. For example, last year in India, the government allowed 20 companies in the nation to sell their goods, as a result, it creates more positive impacts on the economy. Secondly, it creates price competition along with local products, then people find similar products at discount prices. For instance, recently, I went to buy biscuits in the supermarket. I had many options ever before, which was beneficial for me. Therefore it creates many positive impacts on everyone.
There were many challenges that will be facing when people do not buy local products. It may create an obstacle for the local producers of the product. If the products of local people did not buy the citizens, which will lead to shut down their businesses. It may not a good sign for the employment rate. For example, over 20% of people lost their jobs in fish industries, when the government of Pakistan allowed Chinese companies to do their businesses in their country in 2020. Moreover, it may harmful to the environment. If many foreign businesses do their business, which will create more pollution than local do, due to export things. For example, as a result of a survey by the University of Yale. There are 40% of the waste created by outsider food productions companies than national businesses in 2020 in the USA. Indeed, it will lead to many possible problems, it will create more benefits too.
To conclude, this essay discussed both the positive and negative aspects of the statement. In my words, it will helpful for peoples and countrys’ perspectives, therefore its advantages outweigh disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-23 | rajpatel90 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | elveslord77 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | sugussun1994 | 60 | view |
| 2018-11-19 | vishal sachdeva | 86 | view |
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by di erent sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010 73
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think young people should be free to choose their job but other people think they should be realistic and think more about their future Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The charts below give information about world spending and population 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 774, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...er before, which was beneficial for me. Therefore it creates many positive impacts on eve...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13315926893 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82243377776 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506527415144 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.708134731 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9166666667 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9583333333 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95833333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158071651733 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528784493657 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055978873144 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117878728468 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489005128078 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.