It is widely accepted that tourism has become more popular over the last few years. While some people argue that it should have higher amount of payment for acces to enter tourist attractions for foreign people than local ones, I completely disagree with this view, there should be same amount of money both of them.
There are several reasons why I would argue against having imbalance between local and foreign visitors in terms of payment. Firstly, It would be disrespectful toward tourists by separating them from local people because it is completely against to the humanity as well as hospitality. Secondly, paying less money by local people leads not to value cultural and historical heritages. For example, in my country, tourist attractions are not able to provide themselves money to reconstruct after damaging due to visiting them is free for local people. Government spend money to repair them through only taking payments by foreign people. It is not enough to repair.
In my opinion, I argue that both tourists and residents are supposed to pay some amount of money for visiting historical buildings and monuments.There are several benefits of making some payment for everybody regardless of foreign people. By this, people may have positive view about cultures of a country.Japan, for example, there are not imbalance between local and foreign visitors in terms of paying for attractions. It can provide them to increase the number of foreign visitors and help to rise their economy.
In conclusion, for reasons mentioned above, I believe that it would be counterproductive to make tourists pay more than local residents.
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Every year several languages die out every year Some people think that it is not important because life will be easier when there are fewer languages To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing less money by local people leads not to value cultural and historical heritag...
^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...ting historical buildings and monuments.There are several benefits of making some pay...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Japan
...sitive view about cultures of a country.Japan, for example, there are not imbalance b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19622641509 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78452213957 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520754716981 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3450149833 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310531177727 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110856075475 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702759298231 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199629281931 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354277448362 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.