Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind, water and solar) have been encouraged for use by some countries. To what extent is this positive or negative development?
Nowadays majority of regions are appreciating solar thermal plants, wind and water to generate electricity and operating vehicles which lead to healthier environment, cheaper in cost, keep natural resources. However, spending huge amount of natural resources like coal, oil and gases by humans are causes to pollute the atmosphere, perilous ailments and etcetera. Moreover, a school of thought consider that it is in the favour of the whole world.
To begin with, digging and burning natural resources such as coals, oils and gases are leads to spoil the beauty of nature. According to this, steam who released by vehicles and industries operated on these sources are responsible to pollute the level of air. As a result, this polluted air creates lots of detrimental respiratory disease such as asthma, cancer and many more in the globe. Even though, these fossil fuels are emitting large proportion of CO2 gas in the our surrounding so that is why they reduce dramatically the oxygen amount into the air and responsible factor to demolish the few parts of ozone layer. Furthermore, This is also concerning area to build up drastic rise in the global warming. For instance, Texas state electricity board in the USA produces 17 tonnes of carbon dioxide per day to satisfy the needs of its citizens.
In the contemporary world, promoting the alternative sources in the worldwide not only environmental friendly but also assist regimes to preserve natural sources for the upcoming generations. Additionally, generating power by utilising water, wind energy as well as sun rays are very convenient, comfortable and cheaper rather than fossil fuels. For example, China is producing solar farms in the 100 square kilometres, which can generate one million megawatts power, which sufficient for the whole country. Last but not least, rays of sun and water is crucial to make electricity without using coal and other natural resources, it is also beneficial for our atmosphere as well. Moving further, alternative sources are better to enhance the conditions of economy because the never required vast percentage of tools and wealth to making power and not demanding more maintenance as compared with natural resources.
In conclusion, although, fossil fuels are main source for many nations but it is harmful for environment. On the other hand, solar energy, water and wind are beneficial for the world and never reason to spoil the environment.
- The two pie charts below show the percentage of industry sectors’s contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. 61
- In many cities today, most people live in a large apartments blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages? 73
- The diagram below show how glass containers, such as bottles are produced and recycled. 56
- The two pie chart below shows the percentage of industry sectors’s contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Many government thinks that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s are appreciating solar thermal plants, wind and water to generate electricity a...
^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atory disease such as asthma, cancer and many more in the globe. Even though, the...
^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'our'?
Suggestion: the; our
...emitting large proportion of CO2 gas in the our surrounding so that is why they reduce ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 642, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...parts of ozone layer. Furthermore, This is also concerning area to build up drastic rise in the gl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 815, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... never required vast percentage of tools and wealth to making power and not deman...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26275510204 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79420358371 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6514277487 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.9375 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0625 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252134413958 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074530660993 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585520017668 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151408431453 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739165217643 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.