In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live on, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Due to global warming and numerous environmental problems, human survival on Earth will inevitably encounter difficulties in the future. While it is generally held that the authorities should pour money into space research to find another sustainable place, I would argue that it is unnecessary to do so.
It tends to be more challenging to live on the Earth. First and foremost, it is partly due to the gradual depletion of natural resources. Human overconsumption of non-renewable energy for personal purposes leads to the fact that there may be no savings for the future. For example, fossil fuel such as petrol is heavily exploited to cater for the demand of the increasing number of car users. Environmental degradation is another reason. Pollution has permeated every aspect of life, making human survival on Earth impossible if there is no urgent solution. For example, there will be a shortage of freshwater if factories keep discharging chemical waste into rivers and seas.
Although the aforementioned problems should be tackled in order to protect human life, expenditure on the discovery of alternative planets would be a waste. To commence with, resources are required in many other fields apart from space exploration. Money is needed not only to combat youth illiteracy but also to ameliorate hospital infrastructure and provide free healthcare services for the unprivileged. Additionally, instead of finding out a new homeland, solving the current situation of the Earth is much more essential. The public and private sectors’ budget ought to be spent on the production of eco-friendly vehicles and machines which release no or little emissions. For example, by manufacturing cars operated by wind and solar energy, there would be less greenhouse gas and pollution, making it viable to survive on Earth in the future.
In short, although the living conditions on Earth may be too tough to sustain human life, the quest for the new homeland is set to be a waste of time and resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-03 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | dejoyce89 | 84 | view |
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages 56
- Technology development leads to a lot of environmental issues Some people think that a simple lifestyle can preserve the environment while others argue that technology itself can solve it Discuss both sides and give your opinions 89
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out at work What could be the reason for this Do you think it is positive or negative development 84
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live on such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The line chart shows the rate of oil consumption in a small country from 1950 to 2010 The table shows the number of people employed in the oil industry of that country and the rate of unemployment around the country at the same time 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 33, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'living'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: living
...do so. It tends to be more challenging to live on the Earth. First and foremost, it is...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...dly vehicles and machines which release no or little emissions. For example, by ma...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, while, apart from, for example, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20061728395 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03257193346 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9415154382 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.3125 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223292287692 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718350416339 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746671227671 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133121170726 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026567118908 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.