Many people believe that attending a live show is more amusing than watching broadcasting events on TV channels whereas I am of the opinion that we should enjoy it at home.
On the one hand, the option to spectate in live events is attractive for several reasons. Firstly, spectators can feel the euphoria of immersing in a vivid crowd environment. Being a part of the cheering crowd, live attendees can have a thrilling experience. Secondly, this is a chance for die-hard fans to interact directly with their idols as not everyone can have a chance to meet a person who they idolize in reality, so this is definitely a memorable moment.
On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons why I believe that we should prefer watching shows on television. The main one is almost the prices of ticket concert is exorbitantly expensive for ordinary people to afford. Watching such events in front of the screen is very cost-efficient. Moreover, the seating arrangement might block the audience's view so watching televised production will be a great option as we can not only enjoy an event from different aspects but also avoid any hassles and the risk of being injured when being in a sea of people.
In conclusion, while some maintain that live shows offer more recreational experience, I believe that it is better to enjoy it at home as it is more economical and convenient.
In my opinion, the organizing committee should facilitate suitable conditions for people to have an affordable cost and guarantee safety so that everyone can attend the live shows.
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Success is often measured by wealth and material belongings Do you think wealth the best measure of success What makes a successful person 73
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants why do you think people waste food what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86842105263 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82180611401 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586466165414 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9497034367 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.727272727 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4545454545 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217465601349 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080948278308 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649960216381 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114393206245 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642065386998 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.