The issue of buying printed newspapers or books in the future is the one that needs to be looked at carefully. These days, there has been a growing body of opinion that no one will read printed books or newspapers since people are likely to read any electronic books or online newspapers they want without paying. It is true that online newspapers and e-books are convenient. However, I completely disagree with this opinion, and in this essay, I will present the reasons for my view, which are that there are some individuals who cannot buy electronic devices to consume information online and the health problems that are related to using electronic devices for a long time.
To begin with, one of the most compelling reasons for holding my view is that not everybody can access information on the Internet. An argument for maintaining printed paper is that it provides an opportunity for everyone to read newspapers and books at an affordable price. This is due to the fact that a large section of society is unable to pay for the expensive electronic devices to read online newspapers because their income is merely enough to make ends meet. A good example of this is that when I was in high school, I came from a financially disadvantaged region and purchasing a smartphone or a computer to read e-magazines was beyond my reach. That is why I could only learn new things and broaden my horizons by using old books in the local library. In short, it helps to demonstrate that we should preserve the existence of printed books and newspapers so that everyone can access them easily and develop their knowledge.
Another convincing reason for my position is that there are some health issues which are related to continuously using electronic devices. Specifically, it has been widely demonstrated that one clear drawback of using a tablet or computer to read information online for a long time is the negative impact on the human body. There is strong evidence to show that there is a connection between the increased usage of electronic devices and the reduction in physical health. For example, people tend to stare at the screen and sit in the chair with an incorrect posture while they are using a computer. As a result, after a long time, their eyes and spine are negatively impacted. This phenomenon could be seen in students because they use computers or tablets to read books every day. In short, the disadvantage of online books is clear, and this needs to be considered carefully.
By way of conclusion, I believe that people with financial burdens may not have the opportunity to read online newspapers or books because electronic devices are expensive and there are some health problems related to physical health when people use electronic devices to read information online for a long time. Therefore, it seems to me that printed books and newspapers should be continued to produce so that everyone can access to information with low cost and avoid some health issues.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 75
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 92
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central 68
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based o 66
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situ 29
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in short, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 13.1623246493 251% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 23.0 7.30460921844 315% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2486.0 1615.20841683 154% => OK
No of words: 509.0 315.596192385 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88408644401 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72047330159 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444007858546 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 806.4 506.74238477 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.6040572296 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.842105263 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7894736842 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275610977821 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931803865873 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763510258766 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190304128808 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876086655627 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.