galleries should concentrate on the history and art of their own country rather than the works of art of other parts of the world. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
History is part of paramount in every regions, then as the task of galleries should collect some evidences that is becoming inheritances. Some views said that museums must focus on the art or history from their own regions. It is controversial in because of some reasons.
On the one of point of view, the function of galleries are place of heritage goods where each them have a trustworthy narrative and become a typical past event that presents values in society. while that collecting arts from the gifted artist that is giving the best impression in public and got a good judge, therefore this museum provided for the people who is looking for about the story of history. As result, to offer some information about it, the galleries should have many evidences are inheritances from that events or stories. In conclusion, more kinds of heritages is more knowledge which will offered to visitors even will increase the existential of museum or galleries.
On the other side, each areas have typical story where they will introduce their own characteristic of culture, therefore too helpful as them if the contents of gallery is their from. There are some benefits kinds of museum is traditional. The first, values of culture that is showed there will growth the public interesting of this country while that, many appreciations that are given from some communities which will improve being of this area. In addition, this happen companies an advantage as society, especially in history subject is one of the main knowledge.
To sum up, to know anything globally we must learn it from the basic. That is why, my opinion that the main education is history as if it is important to find out about it although is not our culture. I disagree with the statement said that should concentrate with our history because that is will limitation our knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-12 | WIWI UMAR | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | Mai Linh | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-02 | manpreet kaurs | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | cuong.ielts | 89 | view |
| 2018-04-28 | jatinder890 | 56 | view |
- In a number countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on construction new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport 89
- GDP growth per-year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 56
- In some countries, it can be difficult for people over the age of 50 to get good jobs, despite their experience.What do you think are the causes of this problem, and what measure could be taken to sole it. 73
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion. 61
- Parents of obese children should not be punished for making their children fat.Do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... event that presents values in society. while that collecting arts from the gifted ar...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94249201278 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68656853277 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536741214058 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8018201556 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196850782662 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628819611077 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567508597265 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121575848236 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369194391044 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.