Giving aid to poorer countries has more negative effects than the positive effects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Globally, the issue of whether developed countries should support poorer countries has been a topic of discussion for many years. Some people think international aid brings more drawbacks, while this essay will argue that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
To begin with, the provision of international supports from other places enable the government in disadvantageous countries to pursue and maintain social stability. Increasing job opportunities and cheaper commodities would be available if well-developed countries provide financial support, medical help, or technical assistance to less-developed ones, where most residents hardly get rid of poverty. In other words,
Support provided by rich nations can meet the basic survival needs of impoverished people, thereby stabilising the whole area and preventing conflicts, wars and high crime rates. Thus, it is definitely beneficial for poor countries.
In addition, helping under-developed countries can also benefit richer countries through economic cooperation across the world. With the economic development brought by global aid, people in the developing countries will have more disposable savings, thereby stimulating the need for consumption and international business. This means that rich countries may explore a significantly huge potential market where they are able to make profits in a long run. In this case, it is worthwhile to aid poorer nations.
On the other hand, some people are concerned that underdeveloped countries may be difficult to achieve sustainable development since they are highly dependent on foreign nations. Under this circumstance, political leaders may have to make compromises and even give valuable national resources to their money providers because the government will be hardly functioning well without foreign supports.
In conclusion, I would argue that the overall effect of providing foreign aid is positive, despite the possibility that some countries may have no financial independence. Around the world, human beings will live in a better place if richer countries keep supporting poorer ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-28 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-10 | Lunar Tran | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Huong Pham | 56 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Huong Pham | 56 | view |
- Not all family members are having meals together in everyday bases Why Positive or negative 87
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- The diagram shows the process of recycling car batteries 73
- The charts below show the main reasons for the study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 80
- 11 The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rdly get rid of poverty. In other words, Support provided by rich nations can mee...
^^^
Line 10, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... countries keep supporting poorer ones.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8961038961 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14746897864 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.403737544 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.714285714 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1403164839 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531081320278 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387982169518 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745804891811 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538896424233 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.