Irrefutably, it is a debatable argument that some people prioritize arts and culture, therefore, they demand the government's assistance. On the flip side, oppositionist wants to invest funds in public services instead. I strongly disagree with the standpoint. The impending essay will substantiate the significance of art on human beings.
To commence with the disfavor of notion, there are a plethora of factors behind the rubric. Firstly, convention and culture are combined with arts, music, and theatre from the ancient era. Owing to this, it has a massive influence on society as well as on the nation.
For instance, 'The International Art' exhibition is organized in Japan each year for all the Asian countries, they participate to light their heritage and custom nationwide. Such competitions Pride us on our cultural propensity. In addition, artists have unusual expertise in singing, dancing, and crafting, which are very precise to merely a few people overseas. To exemplify, research of London University stated that only a quarter of individuals in the world possesses the ability of crafting, theatre and musicians. Due to the above standpoint, it becomes necessary to invest in it.
Moving further, in the contemporary era, it is not only the passion, but also the occupation for artists, singers, and actresses. In other words, they entirely rely on this, for their livelihood. To epitome, a survey conducted by the cultural department of India manifested that 35% of the population depend on this, as their annual income source. Hence, it plays a vital role in people's employment in this profession.
To conclude, it has examined, although some views suggest the funding would release for art music and theatre is trivial, it endows pride of the nation and occupation for someone. Because of this, the notion is completely disagreed to spend all the budget on the social service sector, despite arts.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 78
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 67
- The bar chart below shows the proportion of English men and women of different ages who were leaving alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the number of bedrooms in one person households 84
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree of disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 114, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...and culture, therefore, they demand the governments assistance. On the flip side, oppositio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29315960912 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92358659743 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622149837134 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2344995194 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2777777778 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199351732461 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537102001028 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555369696435 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105849187248 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651964367739 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.