Government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country. In what extent do you agree or disagree?
In comparison with the ancient times, human lives have been undergone profound transformation as people alter the way they work, study or communicate. Some might claim science subjects should be a priority for the government to spend their expenditure. I, however, totally disagree with this and believe other types of subjects matter more.
To begin with, language education is now raising a big concern from every thanks to the international social networks. People can connect and communicate each other from every corner of the world with the help of the state-of-the-art technology. To do so, a new language acquisition is necessary not only in doing business and international commerce but also in entertainment and national relation. English, as an illustration, has long been a global means of communication into which a majority of information has been translated. Furthermore, ability to understand foreign languages is likely to maximize one's potentials in their future career as that person is able to communicate across borders, connecting the bridge between nations and eventually contributing significantly to their home country.
In addition, art subjects should also be taken into careful consideration because they play an indispensable role in human's lives, in terms of fostering imagination and creativity. As a matter of fact, students have innate talents in artistic fields and were designed to view their surroundings in another perspective would pay little interest in science subjects. Such future artists should be provided an environment to nurture their creative skills as a way to develop their homeland, in form of entertainment. Take South Korea as an example, the country has experience such profound boom in its economy as a result of recreational success.
In conclusion, despite the significance of science subjects, other ones including language and art do place a huge importance in the government's budget, which rather be allocated evenly among a wide range of subjects to meet the demand of people.
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs.What problems this causes? What are solutions? 61
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
- Studies suggested that nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons? And what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or c 89
- Today in many countries people can live and work anywhere they choose because of improved communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
In comparison with the ancient times, human lives hav...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...foreign languages is likely to maximize ones potentials in their future career as th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46372239748 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1768080811 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630914826498 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.102634863 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.230769231 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173194492577 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570131035781 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566936376463 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108435710031 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476508640948 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.