It is important to consider whether government should invest money on local environmental problems or widespread global warming. Although some people think that it would be a wise action to spend money on global warming rather than domestic environmental problems, I completely disagree with this statement. In my opinion, government should focus on their own problems because such problems usually give rise to global warming.
To begin with, global warming has not emerged overnight. This is because it has a number of causative factors, the roots of which are mainly deep-seated on local environmental problems. One such problem is the deforestation, which is directly linked to the origin of global warming. In other words, indiscriminate cutting down of trees result in gradual buildup of carbon dioxide gas, which is the major gas responsible for this vicious phenomenon. If all the countries of the world had encouraged afforestation instead of reckless chopping down of plants for selfish needs, then the world would not have faced with such a grave danger. Therefore, it is quite evident that allocating money to enervate deforestation would reduce the impact of global warming as well.
Moreover, increase burning of the fossil fuels such as coal and petrol in order to run industries and private vehicles not only pollute the air but also build the foundation of global warming. This happens because the fumes and exhausts coming from them lead to depletion of ozone layer, which act as a protective barrier against harmful ultraviolet radiation. That’s why, this deleterious radiation pollutes the air and increases the temperature of the climate, the latter of which has caused melting of glaciers in the North Pole. Ultimately, it has culminated into the rising of sea levels and disappearance of many areas. Thus, if every government focuses on restricting the use of fossil fuel and reducing the number of private vehicle on the streets, this will reduce the rate of air pollution locally as well as the chances of global warming.
To conclude, I think that global warming can be eliminated when all the countries start to solve their own local environmental problems such as deforestation and increase usage of fossil fuel by reserving an adequate fund to these causes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, i think, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23306233062 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84559814084 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566395663957 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6412719132 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.733333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2642864622 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906672235518 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067181195478 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168972767201 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573003096058 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.