Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Money is spent on public transport by Government is always debatable. Some people believe that it is much more important to build railways than roads. This essay will discuss why spending money on railways is superior.

Government should allocate more budget on railway lines because it is convenient and time-saving. trains have the capability to reach the destination faster than road vehicles. Moreover, there is no traffic in their journey so it is much better to get quickly. For example, there is a number of railway lines are constructed between two cities. As a result, citizens can reach their destination faster while travelling through the roads they might get stuck in the traffic. Overall, because of time-saving for passengers while travelling via train so Government should spend money on railways.

If Government spends more money on trains then it will also affect pollution in a good way. Although, building railways in any country, it signs of improving the atmosphere. For instance, there are plenty of vehicles which are driving on the roads such as bikes, cars and buses. In these types of vehicles, they need petrol or diesel so these fuels affect the quality of the air. The bad air cause a lot of health problems, which leads to breath diseases in humans. In short, trains are better than road transport modes because of their positive impact on pollution.

It is increasingly likely that there are a lot of reasons for spending money on railway lines apart from roads. Despite having some difficulties constructing railway lines, there are so many positive aspects.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Trains
...cause it is convenient and time-saving. trains have the capability to reach the destin...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ment should spend money on railways. If Government spends more money on trains ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, then, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in short, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1106870229 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65431878134 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568702290076 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.3099307427 49.4020404114 33% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.7647058824 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4117647059 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229405866005 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734783931325 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541263937403 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148123351151 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453207523734 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.