Some people think that government ought to concentrate wealth on railways over roads. I am totally in favour of the given idea. This essay will support my opinion with relevant examples.
To begin with, the advocates of roads transport insist that laying a heavy emphasis on roadways requires less capital investment than other modes of transport. Because the cost of constructing, operating and maintaining roads is considerably economical, and roads are generally constructed by the regime and local authorities. So a small revenue is charged for the construction of roads. In addition, door to d...
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal.Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and i 90
- Some people think it is more important to plant more tree in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 82
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this sets a bad example to young people.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 90
- TOPIC: In many countries, woman no longer feel the need to get married. Some people believe that this is because woman are able to earn their own income and therefore do not require the financial security that marriage can bring. To what extent do you agr 56
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.5 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 291 350
No. of Characters: 1648 1500
No. of Different Words: 187 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.13 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.663 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.955 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 133 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 118 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 81 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 59 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.188 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.297 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.32 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.516 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.072 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83161512027 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07423225876 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642611683849 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.757352363 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0625 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141275031873 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05059067087 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430093420706 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954228211765 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403799303342 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.