The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of the public. To what extent do you agree?
Vast amounts of money are invested by governments in attempts to discover extraterrestrial life. Some people consider it useless, though. They believe that more funding should be provided in order to tackle more vital issues instead. I am inclined to disagree with such an opinion, because space exploration may soon become critical.
First and foremost, finding other forms of life in the universe can facilitate the humanity’s understanding of itself. It can shed light upon, for instance, the origin of species, thus letting man alleviate many intercultural conflicts, which are built on the premises of fundamental differences between people of different races. In addition, discovery of living organisms outside the Earth can give insights into biological phenomena, which are necessary to cure illnesses now deemed terminal. This will have positive effects on public health.
Secondly, researchers may happen to discover another race of sentient beings, who would probably bring about a revolution on our planet with dramatic changes in numerous fields. Afterwards we could, for example, learn other methods of food and energy production and construction of dwellings. In effect, this would help the humankind to conquer such problems as famine, land degradation and fossil fuels depletion. Consequently, human society will prosper.
Something which is undoubtedly connected with the investigation of extraterrestrial life is colonization of other planets. It may sound unrealistic, but according to many influential scientists and engineers, this could become inevitable due to excessive contamination and exploitation of the environment. Social scientist Mayer Hillman said in an interview for “The Guardian”, that even if the emissions of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere were stopped today, we would not save the planet. The only solution is to evacuate.
All things considered, the exploration of space and, possibly, life in it is a wise and crucial activity. At present, it may be unclear to general public why they should sponsor something so expensive that does not produce immediate results, but it is likely to turn out the most important issue soon.
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of the public. To what extent do you agree? 90
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of the public To what extent do you agree 95
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of the public. To what extent do you agree? 89
- Our personalities are predetermined by our genes before we are born and there is nothing that can be done to alter our character traits. To what extent do you agree? 84
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of the public. To what extent do you agree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anet. The only solution is to evacuate. All things considered, the exploration o...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ivity. At present, it may be unclear to general public why they should sponsor something so ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6234939759 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12269511458 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683734939759 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7167937978 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.722222222 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136408307617 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398799184922 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580456372523 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692187075002 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615591736853 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.