"The Government's investment in arts, music, and theatre is a waste of money. Government should invest these funds in public services instead" to what extend do you agree with this statement
According to some people, investing money on art projects such as music and art facilities are meaningless. Instead, the government should be investing the money on community programs to meet public requirements such as in education or health sectors. I personally disagree with this statement to some extent. this essay will emphasize the reason why both are crucial to our society.
Majority of national income comes from taxes, therefore it should be spent for the community purpose. since education, health, and labour programs are a public basic need, the large sum of national income should invest in these sectors. For instance, providing qualified teacher, funding on national health insurance, developing new health infrastructures such as hospital and health care centre, and providing a job opportunity. As a result, if the public primary need fulfilled, it would lead to the country welfare.
Despite the facts that state above, it is admittedly that music and art exhibitions are inheritance and a part of the culture, therefore those activities should be preserved and passed to the younger generation. since the organization which carries on duty to protect cultural heritage generally is a non-profit organization, an endowment from the government is necessary. Moreover, art and music performance has greatly advantaged for society, especially young people. Teenager uses it to express themselves by singing and dancing either folklore or modern and exploring their creativity.
To sum up, I confidently state that the government should spend a large proportion of the fund in community programs. However, the government funding on futuristic activities is not wasting money as it also has merit to society.
- The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- People Participate in IELTS Program in 6 English Courses in Pare, 2016 56
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 73
- The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extend do you agree? 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK School in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ree with this statement to some extent. this essay will emphasize the reason why bot...
^^^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...uld be spent for the community purpose. since education, health, and labour programs ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...d and passed to the younger generation. since the organization which carries on duty ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49438202247 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00316151499 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588014981273 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5348390769 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.785714286 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229266204183 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757667390919 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636330008229 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141123551432 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731420587863 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.