Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Government should invest on new railways rather than build new roads. I strongly agree.
To begin with, Railways have less impact on environment and occupy less area than roads. Railway can transport many people and commodities simultaneously and it uses less energy per passenger compared to road. Railways usually are part of public assets and are managed by government. In this regard, some environmental policies or new technologies which improve energy efficiency can be easily implemented. On the other side, roads are often used by people which seek their own benefits and do not pay that much attention to environmental issues. They would choose a means of transportation that charges them less disregarding how much it is good for environment.
Secondly, Railway has higher rate of safety than road. Trains move on specific railway and all of them are monitored by experts which means the probability of crashing two trains is almost zero. On the other side, crashing two cars is inevitable and the large number of people die on roads every day.
Lastly, people can easily do their daily routines when they are in the train. It is undoubtedly a very important feature. For instance, reading books, sleeping, playing games and doing your job remotely are all advantages that people would have traveling by train. They can walk along the corridors and prevent to get backache.
In conclusion, train have many advantages which outweigh road’s benefits. Governments should encourage people to use railway mode by virtue of invest money on its infrastructures and decrease the price of its tickets. Government also would be benefited from that. Government would not spend much money to mitigate environmental issues or accommodate medical care for people who are injured in car accidents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-02 | celine ayoub | 67 | view |
| 2024-05-07 | 123456abcxyz | 78 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | zanzendegi | 61 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | zanzendegi | 61 | view |
- today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstance of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment Di 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
...er passenger compared to road. Railways usually are part of public assets and are managed b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...overnment also would benefit from that. Government would not spend much money to mitigate ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, regarding, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19723183391 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77741534362 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595155709343 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0705732654 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0526315789 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2105263158 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204106212215 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590717918412 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574674545349 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118038297245 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564482552617 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.