the line graph gives information about the percentage of
how often the elderly people in the US enjoy free time
activities and how this rate changed over 30 years from
1980 and 2010.
What stands out from the graph is that there were 2
opposite trends for these 5 figures. While the
proportion of square time activities such as hiking,
reading, and surfing the internet witnessed a progress,
elderly people who participate in watching tv and
theater reduced slightly. It’s noticeable that the data for
hiking was the highest percentage in the last year of the
chart.
Starting at quite with watching tv, which was the most
popular in the first 20 years, but then it suddenly
decreased in the last year, by about 60%. In addition,
after experencing a sharp decline from 1980 to 1990,
theatre activity started to climb up considerably about
nearly 50% at the last decade.
Turning to these 3 others, the figure for surfing the
internet was only 5%, which was the least interest in the
first year, but then it progressed gradually from 5% to
nearly 20% between 1980 and 2000. in the last 10 years,
it continued to go up significantly to about 50%.
whereas, starting at 30% with reading, which was higher
than the figure for hiking, at 10%. both of 2 data
improved steadily and reached at 40% together in 1990.
from 1990 to 2010, old people who enjoy hiking
continued improve significantly at 80%, which was the
highest point of the chart. About reading, after
experencing a considerable reduce, it continued to
progress sharply to about 50%
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010 61
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 78
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the line graph gives information about the ...
^^^
Line 22, column 35, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...% to nearly 20% between 1980 and 2000. in the last 10 years, it continued to go ...
^^
Line 24, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...d to go up significantly to about 50%. whereas, starting at 30% with reading, which wa...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 37, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
...er than the figure for hiking, at 10%. both of 2 data improved steadily and reache...
^^^^
Line 27, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...y and reached at 40% together in 1990. from 1990 to 2010, old people who enjoy hiki...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, whereas, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98127340824 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54338830741 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546816479401 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3174433184 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.833333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 29.0 4.38176352705 662% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128992414588 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485766472149 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563246927381 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0313721149608 0.151304729494 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423599715889 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.