The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given line graph compares the number of enquires received by the Tourist Information Office by different means like by letter or email, by telephone, and in-person in a particular city from January to June in 2011.

It is noticeable that over the given period people like to visit the office in person to resolve their queries rather than by phoning or sending an email.

Although just over 400 people had reached the office to enquire about some information, eventually it had significantly increased in the following months and saw a rapid rise between April and June. In June it had recorded the highest ever inquiries with approximately 1900 enquires made by people in person.

The second most preferred way that was chosen by people to solve their queries was by telephone. In January, around 900 people had followed this medium to communicate with the office. In March and April the number of enquires remained the same, however, after April it rose swiftly. In contrast, the had seen a considerable decline in the last three months of the first half of 2011.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
..., however, after April it rose swiftly. In contrast, the had seen a considerable d...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 1615.20841683 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 182.0 315.596192385 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95054945055 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60553714492 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 176.041082164 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598901098901 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 506.74238477 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9007763507 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137033938606 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550900161826 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683310039904 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940428840337 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736410035541 0.056905535591 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.