Due to easy access to air travel, the trend of travelling for touristic or other reasons has significantly increased. Many countries are adding flights every day to meet this huge demand and this is worrisome for environmentalists. This superfluous air travel has damaged air quality and can be avoided by discouraging travelling for leisure.
Growing number of flights everyday has lead to sharp rise in air pollution in last decade. This is due to byproducts of fuel, left in the air, used to drive aeroplanes. Since the engine of aeroplane needs large amount of energy for ignition alone, fuel is used in massive quantities. Needless to say, the pollution index rises exponentially with each air vehicle passing through the air. Statistics show that air quality in countries, where air travel is popular, has dropped by 55% in last five years.These figures are clear manifestation of havoc, frequent usage of air transport is wreaking on the environment.
The best way to reduce the number of flights is to impose heavy environment taxes on tourism. In last few years, most of the air travelers have been tourists because tickets are cheap and flights are readily available. Considering the levels of rise in pollution, air travelling for the sake of fun cannot be afforded so, governments should move to tax such trips. It will force masses to think twice about environment damage before booking a ticket to exotic destination, and reduce this trend altogether. Furthermore, the money collected from such taxes can be used to find alternative energy resources for air vehicles and make strategies for protection of environment.
To conclude, to meet the increasing demand of travelling by air, airports have added more flights in their schedule but it has deteriorated air quality. Therefore, this issue needs to be addressed immediately and it can only be done by implementing financial restrictions on tourism in the form of environment protection tax.
- The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. 61
- Many children are encouraged by their parents to get a part time job in their free time. What are the advantages and disadvantages to children of doing so. 73
- The graph below shows the number of trips made by children in one country to travel to school in 1990 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 11
- The bar chart shows the number of times per week (in 1000s), over five weeks, that three computer packages were downloaded from the internet.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie chart shows the percentage of women in poverty and the bar chart shows poverty rates by sex and age. They are from the United States in 2008. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...or leisure. Growing number of flights everyday has lead to sharp rise in air pollution...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 503, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
..., has dropped by 55% in last five years.These figures are clear manifestation of havo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16981132075 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00772313903 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581761006289 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9644874621 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.061702855882 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0245440557698 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0208282112127 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0416965650065 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180616484406 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.