It is true with the advancement, we tend to forget about our planet earth, and few activities have had an adverse effect on plants and animals. Certain people believe that damage has extended to an extent that, it is now irreversible. I on the other hand would strongly disagree and argue that we have taken several measures to minimize and solve the problem.
To begin with, there are multiple issues or side effects of our activities we do in the name of development. To jot down a few, deforestation leads to soil erosion, disturbs the natural habitat of organisms, and being the primary source of oxygen, it also affects the air we breathe. Many species are now extinct because of the same. This certainly proves the depth of adverse effects our activities have made on wildlife. So in a few people's opinions, nothing now can be done to reverse the problem.
Nevertheless, due to the criticality of the matter, this has now an international matter, and I would like to throw some light on multiple measures that governments and individuals have or can take to stop the bad effect on our planet. First of all, deforestation is now banned in multiple countries and multiple animal welfare societies have been formed. There are now multiple agencies especially taking care of endangered animals and laws are protecting them. There are multiple national parks established. As a result, there is no disruption in their habitat.
I agree, there still is a huge amount of work that needs to be done to minimize the effects, but it is a small correct step that we took towards the greater good. To sum up, I agree with the fact that the government and individuals are now aware of the long-term impact of their actions and are taking corrective measures to solve it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
... towards the greater good. To sum up, I agree with the fact that the government and individuals are now ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, still, as a result, first of all, it is true, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7908496732 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72433009275 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6199789057 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168630798124 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528694515781 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429247878221 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100313057281 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044217821993 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.