Human beings like to copy each other and this is reflected in the popularity of fashion clothes, and consumer goods. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is true that the proclivity of human beings to imitate one another is shown in the prevalence of fashion clothes and consumer commodities. There are good arguments both for and against this view, but I believe it depends on different reasons.
I completely agree with the idea that some individuals like to copy each other so they tend to purchase similar clothes and other consumer goods. The first prominent justification is that fashion has placed importance on modern lifestyle as people increasingly pay attention to aesthetic values. Furthermore, people aspire to fit in because of desirableness to be acceptable and perceived as trendy and stylish individuals. In addition, when it comes to consumer goods, people are inclined to connect the status with some certain brands in today’s society of materialism and consumerism. For example, Giorgio Armani and Mercedes are two of the brands symbolize for status and success.
However, I believe that not everyone wants to follow others. Firstly, regardless of the trend in fashion and products, some people want to keep their own lifestyle and maintain their individualities, especially some artist who want to create their own styles. Secondly, for those who do not care about the outward appearance of products like the elderly and the underprivileged, the value in use plays a more vital role. Finally, not only is imitating leads to purchasing similar commodities but also advertising is another reason contributes to the prevalence of fashion and consumer products. For instance, if Apple had not started such great marketing campaigns, it would not have made a huge trend whenever they launched a new version of a cell phone.
In conclusion, while reasons can be given to justified that the inclination of human beings to imitate others is reflected in the ubiquity of fashion and consumer products, I believe this is not an accurate statement under any circumstances.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-06-20 | quynhan1995 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 84
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 74
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The given bar chart illustrates the figures for the frequency of having junk foods at the restaurants of American people from 2003 to 2013. 73
- Human beings like to copy each other and this is reflected in the popularity of fashion clothes, and consumer goods. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26366559486 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00328428627 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588424437299 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2321738907 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.923076923 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269713569524 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782634957 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896239073157 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165530188206 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764532471203 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.