The increase in production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. Cause? what can be done to solve.
In this growing world, the industries are enhancing the quantity of making consumers things which cause catastrophic impact to the natural environment. This essay will highlight that why this is happening because of wastage of goods and lack of recycle activities and also discuss some positive steps that can be taken to tackle this situation.
To commence with, even though there are myriad of reasons but most prime one is wastage of products that are derived from the environment. To explicate it, in this contemporary era, individuals waste plethora of objects in order to show off their lifestyle like petroleum, diesel, plastic and many more and most of the people are deprived from the feeling of enjoyment of that items. Because of this, manufacturing units speed up the manufacturing process to reach these products in every person hands. Apart from
this, population is increasing at a startling rate which increase the demands of every product.
Strolling towards the solutions, regime should implement some explicit rules and strict punishments on wasting particular items that are being produced by the organisations from environment so that folks would not waste these natural items. Moreover, people should re-used products like plastic rather than discard and companies should recycle consumer goods. Recycling not only propitious for environment but also organisations can make huge profit with this. If organisations re-use these waste to create things, then natural environment will be safe. For instance, dabur company use used materials to make containers for packing of their products.At the last, regime should educate people about the worst impact of increasing population.
To conclude, although the problem of increase in production of consumer goods is very dangerous for environment, but it can be controlled with the help of both people as well as governments by playing equal role to preserve the environment of earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-26 | harry@uppal | 89 | view |
- The bar graph shows the information about the recycling of household waste in a city from 1992 to 2002 70
- In the last century when a human astronaut arrived on the moon he said it is a big step for mankind But some people say it makes little or no difference to our daily life To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 61
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher Others think that it is always better to have a teacher Which one do you prefer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 651, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: At
...ontainers for packing of their products.At the last, regime should educate people ...
^^
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...controlled with the help of both people as well as governments by playing equal role to pr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then, well, apart from, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44590163934 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82139482259 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596721311475 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.4094037669 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.416666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224087135712 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083624592861 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581669458423 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13316138946 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623319174545 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.