With the increasing demand for energy sources such as oil and gas should people be looking for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched places Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas

The rapid growth of population has brought many serious problems, one of which is the lack of energy, so we need to find new mining areas. Some provinces plan to find new oil fields and natural gas in uninhabited areas. In my opinion, the disadvantages of this idea outweigh its advantages.
Admittedly, there are several advantages accruing from oil exploitation. The immediate one is that the remote areas with oil reserves have the potential to stimulate the economy and generate employment. For instance, Saudi Arabia, which is the largest exporter of crude oil in the world, has built many factories to exploit energy sources. The government has earned a lot of money by selling raw oil and gas to developed countries. Besides, this business activity provides people with many job opportunities such as engineering, communication, education and catering businesses. However, these benefits do not necessarily imply that oil exploration in uninhabited places is completely acceptable.
In fact, the negative impacts of looking for oil and gas are irreversible. There is no doubt that it will harm the environment. After being exploited for a long period of time, lands will have no more value. Also, gas and oil are non-renewable energies. Thus, if we overexploit them, the next generation will have to face more serious problems than we do now.
These resources may also arouse the greed of others and thus cause war. For example, due to the outbreak of the Fourth Middle East War in October 1973, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) announced an oil embargo and suspended exports in order to fight against its opponent Israel and the countries that support Israel. This caused oil prices to rise, and ultimately caused severe economic turndown in most industrialized countries around the world.
In conclusion, oil exploitation has caused many other serious problems. Perhaps, we should use renewable resources such as electricity and wind to make our world a better place.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nment. After being exploited for a long period of time, lands will have no more value. Also, g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, look, may, so, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21981424149 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92923762319 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628482972136 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0612709808 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7368421053 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317037390716 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883273084936 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600086571222 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151558183346 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789891270108 0.056905535591 139% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.