An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems does this cause?
What can be done to deal with this situation?
In recent times, it is being observed that plethora of experts belonging to medical or pedagogical background are migrating from their unprivileged countries to affluent nations. There are various issues which would originate from this phenomenon, such as dearth of competent workers and stagnation of economy. This state, however, can be ameliorated by granting apropos remuneration to staff and by augmenting the standard of living in the nation.
To commence with, which predicaments would emerge out due to this trend? The cogent hurdle would be in the scarcity of provisions of medical and educational amenity to dwellers. As the elite employees would emigrate to other regions, denizens would be deprived of basic necessities which would result in considerable rise in maladies as well as youth of country would suffer under the lack of such professionals. The whole nation, consequently, would be engulfed in the state of adversity resultantly. This can be efficaciously illustrated by the study conducted by researchers of Stanford University, by whom it has been discovered that brain drain is the leading reason behind the reduction in the scholastic efficacy of India, Pakistan and other undeveloped countries over the past few decades.
However, this problem can be curbed by the decisive actions of regime. Primarily, the authorities should create some amendments in the current structure of the working sector with the purpose of significantly enhancing the income of elites in disparate vocations, whereby the professionals would eschew migrating abroad. For instance, the researchers dwelling in USA and Canada scarcely shift to distinct territory as they already relish the superior remuneration and facilities in their respective country. Hence, if government manage to sanction adequate amenities to the experts, they would refrain from relocating and would assist in fostering the progress of their native country.
To conclude, paltry of appropriate monetary grants and insufficient fundamental facilities are the prominent rationales behind this phenomenon. Nevertheless, by ensuring apropos amenity and better perks, this issue can be effectively alleviated which would, otherwise, result in significant forfeiture to the nation and its financial domain.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-12 | phuongnhung3107 | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-02 | Luc1Ferrr | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-24 | Harjeet kaur23 | 82 | view |
| 2021-03-14 | Vicky_2702 | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-24 | Mohit Wadhwa | 89 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 78
- Essay topics Nowadays many people go shopping in their free time Shopping has replaced many other activities that people used to choose as their hobby what is the reason for this Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Some people think that managers alone should make decisions in the company while others think that employees should be involved in the decision making process too Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... regions, denizens would be deprived of basic necessities which would result in considerable rise...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71847507331 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08397336551 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601173020528 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5043619049 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.285714286 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188983921548 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699991330282 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403552929746 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120030839916 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234623036627 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.