An increasing number of schools provide tablets and laptop computers for students to use in school, replacing books and other printed materials like exams and assignments.
It is true that many schools now prefer that their students use multimedial devices rather than traditional learning material such as books and whiteboards for their learning. This new style of teaching brings about many benefits for students in terms of flexibility, but there are aslo some negative aspects which can lower the quality of teaching and learning, or endanger student's health.
Technology in education has brought about many benefits in terms of learning, and since the computer became affordable and therefore common in schools, learning has become easier than it was. Multimedial devices such as tablets and computers can make the experience of learning much more interesting. By using the internet, students can now access a great deal of information. For instance, by questioning the internet, a student interested in a specific topic of marine biology can gain information from the whole world, from many teachers and institution, whereby they can extend their knowledge in such a way that would have been simply unthinkable up to a few decades ago. This makes modern students more flexible and able to quickly access many different educational sources.
On the other hand, the use of technological devices may jeopardise the quality of education in some circumstances. This is because although computers are simply exceptional in making gather information far easier than before, they can also be a big source of distraction. For instance, if a pupil surfs of Facebook during a lesson, they are likely to miss important concepts tought, and therefore their learning experience will be negatively affected. Another important aspect is related to the over exposure of blue light emmitted by those devices, which causes retina problems.
In conclusion, the advantages of using multimedial devices in education are clearly beneficial for the majority of students, however, there is a concrete risk that such devices can also be a source of distraction, and be overused, causing eye problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | Mimibae 985 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | Mimibae 985 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | drake | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | PHAM ANH THU | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | prachirai | 73 | view |
- Many people decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it This they argue leads to a more satisfying working life To what extent do you agree with this view What other things can people do in order to have a satisfying working life 36
- Nowadays more and more people want to live by themselves. What are the reasons? Is this a positive or negative trend? 80
- In some cultures old people are valued more while in other cultures youth is considered more valuable Discuss both views and give your own opinion 87
- The diagrams below show the current ground floor plan of a museum and the proposed changes to its layout Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 87
- The line graph shows the number of people who moved from four European countries to the United States of America 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 746, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ore flexible and able to quickly access many different educational sources. On the other ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36593059937 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90538503949 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561514195584 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.4426687823 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.75 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145653043177 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561047691542 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456136891178 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890395976661 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046273788723 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.