with an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past. to what extent do you agree?

Essay topics:

with an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past. to what extent do you agree?

With the proliferation of high tech devices such as ipads and touch-screen phone, there is an increasing population preferring to communicate via such products, thereby concerns for the death of actual communication in person. However, critics might hold the opposite view. This essay will argue that face to face communication might not be a thing of the past. It will focus on its necessities to individual's and business life.
To nuture interpersonal relationships successfully, conversating in person is one of the crucial methods. The reason is that people talking face to face enable them to feel the changing air and others' emotions, which assist them to understand others well. This could lead to nice talks with friends and enhance their friendships. Besides, face to face conversation allow people the chances of body languages. Because of that , they cold express friendliness by a warm smile or empathy by a hug or a simple touch of shoulder. In result, these gestures something better than words and people are bonded. Therefore, face to face conversation have critical impacts on improving relationships among peoples.
To meet partners and talk in person is a kind of business manners. This is because mutual respects is the foundation of any relationships including business kinds and a face to face communication is just the first step of showing mutual respects and sincerity by introducing oneself and welcoming counterparts. Although ultilizing computers to have video chats might be an efficient way to discuss important issues, the shortage is that it feels time ticking and easily gets into serious talks in all likelihood. Henceforth, face to face talk is significant in business interaction.
In conclusion, to communicate in person will not be outdated, owing to its essences that people continually keep in touch with friends and relative via face to face conversation as well as those want to succeed in business for it is a manner of display your respects and friendliness.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-03 carolyn 78 view
2016-10-13 ahmad3khan 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndividuals and business life. To nuture interpersonal relationships successfully...
^^
Line 2, column 425, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ances of body languages. Because of that , they cold express friendliness by a war...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22670807453 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10502392826 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5572050443 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.1875 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299078399748 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092066422082 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960528559815 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195651549903 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784679513657 0.056905535591 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.