Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
In recent years, problems related to transportation and environment have gained in popularity in a great many ways. Some people believe that increasing petrol price is the most effective solution to tackle these issues. In my perspective, the mentioned measure may work, but it is not the most optimal solution. Therefore, I will recommend several ways to address these situations in the following paragraphs.
It is undeniable that the more expensive fuel is, the fewer traffic and environmental problems exist. As the price goes up, people may use their budget for other purposed such as education and healthcare rather than commuting. In terms of transportation, it will mitigate the volume of individual transports and traffic congestion. Thanks to this, citizens can save a considerable amount of money and time for traveling. Additionally, the amount of exhaust fume released from combustion engines will reduce, which contributes to a fresher atmosphere.
However, rising the petrol price is not considered to be the most effective solution since public transports upgradation and educational campaigns are also advisable. Government shout invest in traffic infrastructure and enhance public transportation system in order to encourage commuters to use it. As a result, people may feel it convenient and economical so they will consider it as their first choice when it comes to transportation. Moreover, educational programs should be carried out to raise people's awareness of the current level of traffic and pollution problems. Therefore, they will feel the need to adjust their commuting behaviors to protect our surroundings.
In conclusion, although increasing fuel price seems to have some positive impacts on the way people travel, other measures such as upgrading public transports system and raising citizen's consciousness of preserving our environment are believed to be more effective in this case. In addition, each country should carry out flexible solutions to adapt to specific situations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | ghikar | 78 | view |
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Some people think that we should focus on processes to be successful in life Others however believe that results are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 68
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- In many places, prisons are crowded and expensive for governments to maintain.Yet, when offenders are released, they end up back in prison a short while latter.Does prison work? Should lawbreakers be rehabilitated or punished? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less traffic'?
Suggestion: less traffic
...le that the more expensive fuel is, the fewer traffic and environmental problems exist. As th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...ng public transports system and raising citizens consciousness of preserving our environ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59283387622 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14889213059 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599348534202 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6932251577 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.3125 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130746366895 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039308306745 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434305650316 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081160127624 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221855179166 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.