Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
The issue of climbing the number of cars and traffic in mega cities is now a high priority problem. Although some argue that there is just one efficient solution to handle that and it is to raise fuel price, others, including myself, disagree and believe there could be some other helpful actions.
If petrol becomes expensive, the costs of transportation would be increase as a result, and it directly affects on prices of commodities. It means that although this kind of strategy might reduce the traffic in the streets, it has disadvantages such as inflation. Besides, it has been seen in many countries that the policy of increasing the costs of goods and/or services will not always cause the reluctancy of using them.
On the other hand, there are various alternative measures could be done to improve this important issue. One is to introduce a limitation on producing or importing automobiles. Another one could be for the government to buy older cars from owners and give them new less pollutant cars. Also fining drivers who pick their cars without any other passenger and make streets crowded, in order to courage people using public transportation when they are going to travel lonely, is a contributory movement.
In conclusion, I personally disagree with considering a raise in fuel price as a best possible option for controlling the traffic and contamination caused by that, because it can result in a jump in a prices of almost all other services and commodities, as well as the fact that the effect of this policy on decreasing car usage is not definite. There are other choices like curbing car production and import, substituting old vehicles, and to penalize cars with only one passenger.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | ghikar | 78 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. 76
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... and give them new less pollutant cars. Also fining drivers who pick their cars with...
^^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...th considering a raise in fuel price as a best possible option for controlling th...
^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a prex', 'a price' or simply 'prices'?
Suggestion: a prex; a price; prices
...hat, because it can result in a jump in a prices of almost all other services and commod...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, well, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99651567944 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81126159131 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.5820140278 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.363636364 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150715902419 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525780556315 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374026389777 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875639698016 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144804995009 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.