Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
— Say nothing.
It has happened for all us that in a workshop or an educational class or gatherings like those, the lecturer implies something which is not true. Personally, I believe that the best and polite decision to make is to write it down, in order to memorize, and have a conversation with him/her after the session ends. I feel this for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, a lecturer, usually a master, professor or experienced expert, should be considered a knowledegable person in his/her specific field, in the view of audience. By declaring his/her mistake in front of them, he/she kind of loses respect afterward. As a result, the whole class or meeting would continue less effectively. My personal experience could be a compelling example of this. I remember back in college, once one of my professor was arguing a theory, one of my classmates challenged him and said he understand the theory incorrectly. After it was elaborated that the student was right, I kind of felt that the professor has not seized the field he is teaching.
Second of all, generally when someone is speaking in front of a population, interrupting his/her conversation would cause him/her to lose concentration. In such sessions, the speaker usually programs the sequence of subjects, the context of each part of lecture, and even the way of idea expression. When someone jumps in the middle of this planned process, the speaker's focus on subject might decline, consequently. So, it is not an appropriate way of challenging his/her ideas.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that in the occasion of founding the teacher speaks incorrectly, the more beneficial option would be to talk to him/her after the class, instead of interrupting the conversation at the moment. This is because, a teacher, or someone in same position, needs to known as a skillful and knowledgeable person for ones attending the class, not a person who is wrong. Also, cutting of the speech, could result in deviating in the speaking schedule programmed by professor.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 94
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'understands'.
Suggestion: understands
...y classmates challenged him and said he understand the theory incorrectly. After it was el...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 344, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...a skillful and knowledgeable person for ones attending the class, not a person who i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, second, so, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00872093023 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00500838245 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566860465116 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2931808558 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6875 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0955037315097 0.236089414692 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030360308009 0.076458572812 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356095844373 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.057640837361 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310451010346 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.