increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems,to what extend do you agree or disagree,what other measures do you think might be effective?
With the ever-increasing amount of consumption for fossil fuels as the primary source of energy, comes the question whether a higher price tag on petrol would be the best remedy for congestion and air pollution, two commonest problems shared by major metropolitans worldwide. From where I stand, there are no easy answers to neither of the problems and therefore a growth in petrol price is only part of the solution, which is to be coupled with other measures.
congestion pricing has been shown to work, at least at a smaller, localised scale in some parts of the world. In that regard, there have been successful examples like London and Singapore, where drivers are charged an additional fee to enter certain areas of the town during specific hours. this practice seems effective, as in those cities traffic has been greatly reduced while air quality significantly improved, both thanks to the charging policies.
while this is useful to some extent, there are other measures that are worth equal consideration. For one thing, employers can implement flexitime, a regime allowing the employees to gain more flexibility at choosing their time for commuting, which in turn should allow them to avoid the peak hours. Ideally, this ought to keep cars off the road. People can also be encouraged to adapt for electric cars, an eco-friendlier option than their traditional fuel driven counterparts, as they emit zero air-polluting gas. In addition to that, the government should target the investment in the public transport, which is known to be by far more efficient in terms of capacity than private cars.
To conclude, it is perhaps a bit too simple-minded to think that raising the petrol price is the single best solution to congestion and pollution problems. city management involves the subtle balance between economic efficiency and environmental ethics. Thus, policy makers should try to take into account as many alternatives as possible for optimal results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | hdhesam | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | truelove_shinn | 89 | view |
| 2017-07-25 | Yasir Wazir | 56 | view |
| 2017-07-25 | Yasir Wazir | 56 | view |
- increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems,to what extend do you agree or disagree,what other measures do you think might be effective? 89
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
... as the primary source of energy, comes the question whether a higher price tag on petrol would be t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Congestion
...to be coupled with other measures. congestion pricing has been shown to work, at leas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...reas of the town during specific hours. this practice seems effective, as in those c...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...h thanks to the charging policies. while this is useful to some extent, there ar...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 157, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: City
...n to congestion and pollution problems. city management involves the subtle balance ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, in addition, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21630094044 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84877270774 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658307210031 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4785134826 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114944318735 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037307849687 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045210802925 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674798592153 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354279474401 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.