It is widely believed that the most effective way to address growing traffic and environmental pollution is to increase the price of fuel. From the personal perspective, I strongly argue that, besides raising the price of petrol, there are numerous different methods, which have brought the same positive impacts, to deal with current environmental issues.
On the one hand, there are persuading reasons why citizens put their belief in the government's policy to raise higher price of natural fuels to tackle some problems related to traffic and pollution. This is mainly because petrol has a crucial role to play in the operation of traffic. The soaring petrol's price can act as a deterrent for people who using their private cars or motorbikes switch to other public transportations to reduce the cost of moving. As a result of the diminution in the quantity of traffic, the environment also do not have to put up with enormous negative consequences such as exhaust gas, dust and discharged fumes. For example, when Australian government applied 20% higher tax on fuel industry in 2000, the traffic congestion has declined dramatically and also curbed the carbon footprint released on the environment through transportation.
On the other hand, I contend that some measures on traffic participants also contribute to combat the increasing number of traffic and serious pollution problems. Firstly, the government can enforce strict regulations on the owner of traffic in case they do not comply with the policies in terms of both traffic and the environment. The police and functional agencies must have a right to address offenders by fine or confiscation of driving licenses, which can directly affect on the consciousness of drivers and motorbikes. Secondly, through various environmental campaigns, the government also encourages inhabitants to make use of public infrastructure for the purposes of delivery and moving for the sake of the community's health and the environment. These methods can have a long-term impact because they modify people's behaviors and awareness.
In conclusion, increasing the price of petrol is only one of the various ways to deal with the pressing concerns of society , including growing traffic and pollution problems
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'numerous'.
Suggestion: numerous
... raising the price of petrol, there are numerous different methods, which have brought the same po...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ns why citizens put their belief in the governments policy to raise higher price of natural...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...of driving licenses, which can directly affect on the consciousness of drivers and motorb...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 712, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of delivery and moving for the sake of the communitys health and the environmen...
^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...al with the pressing concerns of society , including growing traffic and pollution...
^^
Line 4, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g growing traffic and pollution problems
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33988764045 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00797559932 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570224719101 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.3649710026 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.230769231 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3846153846 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195645978424 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754982773381 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713669326828 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1392189832 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442098312438 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.