While some folks insist that soaring the fare of gasolines is the most outstanding approach to tackle expanding transportation systems and impairment issues, i believe rising the expense of oils in some way can deal the obstacle. There are several paths which sound even utterly convincing. This essay will discuss firstly the impact of increasing bills of petrols, secondly, the part of public transportations and finally, the move of the regime with relevant examples.
Primarily, a substantial drop in the transport is the major outcome of spiking the payment of fuels because the increased figure will either relatively reduces the frequencies of the operators or brainwashes them to share motors in order to achieve financial savings. However, the policy tends to be potent only for impoverished citizens as the affluent society can stand determined in spite of the amount, which ascertains why the guideline is not absolutely ideal.
On the second place, all passengers ought to be emboldened to lay number one emphasis to trains, buses, bicycles and so on over cars, which are the paramount determinants of the green house gases that are strictly liable for the contamination of pristine atmospheres. If the public sorted out top priority to mass transits, not only would public transit services become purely instrumental in lightening crippling burdens of fragile environments but also every individual would feel fit as a fiddle since cycling and walking on foot burn calories significantly.
Last but not least, the government needs to enact criminal laws and promote heightened awarenesses in the nation. The public would be bound to stick to rules and regulations, for violating orders could throw them to overcrowded prisons provided that the authority enacted criminal laws against the drivers who would run second hand vehicles, which generally emit noxious gases as opposed to contemporary automobiles. And also, alerting communities is potentially fruitful subjecting to a drastic decline in the spoliation as many motorists are typically unfamiliar about the toxic emissions.
In conclusion, presumably, with the consideration of decreased loads on delicate surroundings, effective deterrences and delivering basic educations, the strategy of doubling the cost of petrol is nowhere near as powerful as the protocol of the ministry.
- Art is considered an important part of a society as well as an expression of its culture Do you think it is important for children to be taught art Do you think children should be encouraged to focus on art rather than other subjects 77
- TOPIC In many countries woman no longer feel the need to get married Some people believe that this is because woman are able to earn their own income and therefore do not require the financial security that marriage can bring To what extent do you agree 98
- 13.09.2017 Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 87
- Many criminals re-offend after they have been punished. Why do some people continue to commit crimes after they have been punished, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? 100
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities.Others,however,say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both views and give your own op 97
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
The main content should focus on: 'Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems'. not 'What measures do you think might be effective?'
or at least half half.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 363 350
No. of Characters: 1953 1500
No. of Different Words: 244 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.365 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.38 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.947 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 150 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 122 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 88 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 33 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.434 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.818 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.318 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.655 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.056 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ortation systems and impairment issues, i believe rising the expense of oils in s...
^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sis to trains, buses, bicycles and so on over cars, which are the paramount deter...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52066115702 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03075128165 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66391184573 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.9300581957 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.181818182 106.682146367 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0429406593692 0.244688304435 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0138178866224 0.084324248473 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0122808405356 0.0667982634062 18% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0233052861513 0.151304729494 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0111844880813 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.0946893788 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.32 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.