Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
petrol is important as it is the energy source of vehicles. thus, some people may reckon that raising the price of petrol is able to release the serious circumstance of traffic system and air pollution, but I believe that this statement is inefficiency to solve the problems.
To begin with, while the way of raising the cost of petrol may reduce the driving intent of the vehicle driver, we should know that the type of vehicle is changing to electricity instead of petrol now. So, the traditional vehicle will be outdated by the latest generation and the significance of arising petrol’s price will be lower. Also, pollution problems are various that vehicle pollution is only little. Therefore, the increasing traffic as well as the poor air cannot release by the above suggestion.
There are several plans to release the traffic and pollutions situation. An international example would be strong support that road management in China. The government is managing the usage of road by restricting half of drivers who just allow to drive on assigned days, such as from Monday to Thursday, which reflection of the above measurement is positive that it drops the crowded environment on the road as well as release the flue gas comes from vehicles. thus, the recommendation of restricting driving days may be the best way to solve the serious environment.
In conclusion, as the result of raising the petrol’s price may not obvious, I strongly disagree with this statement and I reckon that controlling the road traffic is better than the original method.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-27 | cocococo123 | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | cocococo123 | 73 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?What other measures do you think might be effective? 56
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 56
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 67
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Petrol
petrol is important as it is the energy source...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...as it is the energy source of vehicles. thus, some people may reckon that raising th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...lease the flue gas comes from vehicles. thus, the recommendation of restricting driv...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic is better than the original method.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, i reckon, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06563706564 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88037616243 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532818532819 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.8868230812 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.272727273 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203331423834 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765871569407 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334199656714 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12267257717 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171342824279 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.