Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years the issue of preserving the environment has attracted a great deal of public attention. Personally, I disagree with the idea that only the authorities and big organizations can carry out the task since the general population can also be of great help.
On the one hand, it is evident that effective governmental and organizational activities are necessary. By carefully legislating on the matter, governors will be able to deter people from causing harm to the surroundings. There are certainly people who will act only when they are bound to the law. For instance, Singapore, the cleanest country in the world, acquires its reputation as a result of the harsh penalties imposed on litter bugs. In addition, environment protection should be considered by businesses a part of their sustainable development. Instead of placing profit at top of their agenda, they had better produce environmentally friendly products and appropriately invest in proper waste treatment units.
Nevertheless, citizens of a country still play an irreplaceable role in improving the environment. Firstly and most importantly, they should strictly obey regulations concerning the surroundings. This basic yet efficient step is likely to make a huge difference. Secondly, household waste, which comprises a large proportion of the total amount discharged to the environment, needs to be reduced. The average Australian, for example, produces 1.5 tonnes of waste in a year. Should each person be more aware of curbing the amount of garbage produced, the whole society can go green. Another thing that can be done by residents is to minimize the amount of private traffic. A drop in the number of private motorized vehicles can bring about a significant decline in the amount of harmful gases emitted to the atmosphere, which is, without doubt, beneficial to our planet.
To conclude, while current governments and other organizations’ practices are important, we cannot deny the significance of the general public in protecting the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | dknk | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Bakhtiyar1 | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | cathylearnsrock | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | Chinkiarora | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | winiston | 67 | view |
- Nowadays, the most important task is the protection of the environment for future generations. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- You and some friends ate a meal at a restaurant to celebrate a special occasion and you were very pleased with the food and service Write a letter to the restaurant manager In your letter give details of your visit to the restaurant explain the reason for 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 67
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both views and giv 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... we cannot deny the significance of the general public in protecting the environment.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, while, another thing, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42946708464 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24717078094 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648902821317 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1344699455 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.882352941 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150011287772 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384337663583 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413596517451 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817207159279 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445152598138 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.