Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.
What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?
What solutions can you suggest?
Various species have become extinct as a result of human activity. The main causes of ecosystem diversity loss are the increase of waste emission and hunting habits, and several actions can be taken to tackle this issue.
These days, there are many factors contributing to the loss of bio-deversity and extinction of certain species. Firstly, fossil fuel is one of the major sources of energy in many countries. The amount of carbon dioxide emitted from fossil fuel is not only highly toxic for different species but also can be the reason for serious accidents. Secondly, for many centuries, people have hunted other living organisms for consuming and clothing purposes. Certainly, these hunting activities have led to the disappearance of numerous exotic animals. For example, several types of rabbits have nearly become extincts, since their fur is used in coat manufacture.
The further loss of bio-diversity could be ceased in many ways. By allocating more funding on the research for finding an alternative source of energy, this problem might be solved. For instance, the amount of hazardous emission will significantly drop if solar energy fully replaces fossil fuel. Another possible solution to this problem is enforcing strict laws against hunting. people will greatly change their hunting customs when they are aware of the probability of being charged/sued for it. Thus, the authorities might be able to save some endangered species.
In conclusion, it was demonstrated that even though human being have resulted in less diversed ecosystem, still, this issue can be overcome. The government should financially support the scientists in the search of an alternative mean of energy and enact laws to prevent hunting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | marin123 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | ibmsayem | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | Gurvi singh | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Milan karki | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Sai sushma | 61 | view |
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 67
- One problem faced by almost every large city is traffic congestion What do you think the causes are What solutions can you suggest 89
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 657, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their fur is used in coat manufacture. The further loss of bio-diversity could ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 382, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
... enforcing strict laws against hunting. people will greatly change their hunting custo...
^^^^^^
Line 16, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ergy and enact laws to prevent hunting.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45054945055 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7557962394 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6336996337 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6208375795 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189067263652 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063771115947 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761342182678 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130821851126 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569322751242 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.