The fast-paced development in the field of science and technology is affecting the overall environment negatively. Due to the abnormal increase in population and advancement in technology, other species are in the peril of becoming extinct due to the destruction caused by human activities. Policymakers and members of the public are under an obligation to take measures in order to avert the unwanted consequences.
Deforestation is one of the significant threats to the existence of wildlife . In order to meet the housing and transportation needs of the growing population, trees are cut down to construct new roads and housing societies, thereby resulting in the damage to animal's natural habitat. As a result of this, many animals are unable to survive in such atmosphere. In addition, ozone layer depletion, caused by the excessive use of machines having a large carbon footprint, has disturbed the overall climate. Irregular rain pattern has been proven to be the biggest risk for the survival of wildlife.
However, the general public and the policy makers can take steps to mitigate these risk. The first step worth taking is to limit the damage at its source: restrict the city expansion and road construction by providing a reasonable alternatives. For instance, governmet can promote the concept of constructing a multi-storey apartment instead of individual house. Another pragmatic approach would be to restrict the use of devices and gadgets that result in emission of carbon dioxide.
To conclude, human biengs are damaging the ecological system for the sake of their own comfort and convenience without considerng its impact on surroundings. However, those who control and govern us and the general public can play their role to address the threat to the entire system
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced. 11
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 84
- Instead of training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics, governments should spend the money on programmes encouraging the public to be active and stay healthy.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answe 84
- Education is not a luxury, but a basic human right and as such should be free for everyone irrespective of personal wealth.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people prefer to provide help or support directly to the local community. Others prefer to give money to national or international charitable organizations. Discuss both views and give ur opinions? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ant threats to the existence of wildlife . In order to meet the housing and transp...
^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e survival of wildlife. However, the general public and the policy makers can take steps to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'alternative'?
Suggestion: alternative
... construction by providing a reasonable alternatives. For instance, governmet can promote th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...those who control and govern us and the general public can play their role to address the thre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31690140845 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01243140965 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609154929577 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4095888917 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.857142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0678581993096 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0201247749723 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249166179482 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0387060160636 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149174276747 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.