Intelligent robots will be more widely used in the future. Is this blessing or a curse?. What is your opinion?
It is irrefutable that there will be a rapid evolution to the intelligent robots in the digital future. From my perspective, this is a positive development which can bring considerable benefits.
First of all, intelligent robots have brought about automation in a variety of fields ranging from manufacturing to space science. As far as manufacturing industry is concerned, the productivity has been risen considerably higher than manual workers by virtue of mass production as well as precise assembly work of smart robots. As the results, the manufacturing output would increase dramatically in the whole industry which would enable the world economy to develop in leaps and bounds. Additionally, intelligent robots also play a vital role when it comes to space science. Numerous space robots have been sent by scientists to explore other planets in the universe. The population explosion and resource degradation are the main urgent matter that urges space study from robot assistance.
In addition, humans are able to prevent disasters to a certain extent by virtue of intelligent robots. To be more detailed, geologist can take advantage of robots to explore unstable geological environments, such as both active and dormant volcanos, thus making accurate predictions and giving dangerous warnings in good time. For instance, in Japan, remote control robots have not only found radiation in nuclear power plants but also extinguished fires in hot spots. These robots play an important role in the search and recovery of disasters, which can lead to dangerous places to prevent unnecessary human death. In developed nations, intelligent robots have also helped people to clean their houses, teach children as well as protect the environment.
In conclusion, I am strongly the opinion that intelligent robots certainly are and will be a great blessing for human race for the aforementioned reasons.
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- Fossil fuels are the main sources in many countries but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is it positive or negative development 93
- Schools should emphasize academic subjects, which are more important for future jobs, rather than sports and music. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43434343434 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00779519847 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612794612795 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9112674517 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222573241714 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769468729316 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080110944478 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160171856012 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662334126375 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.