International community must act immediately to ensure all nations to reduce their consumption of fossil fuels e.g. gas and oil. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
One of the global problems which are headlines on mass media and scientific reports is the energy use recently. It is believed that International community should take actions urgently in order to decrease the consumption of fossil fuels such as coal, oil and gas. From my perspective, I agree with the statement to some extends. This essay aims to express the writer’s opinion about the noticeable drawbacks of this phenomenon.
First of all, it is clearly seen that fossil fuels consumption is one of the major contributors to global warming and other environmental problems. As a matter of fact, the combustion of fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. These carbon footprints enhance radioactive forcing and leads to the global warming which is associated to numerous of adverse effects, especially the melting of ice gaps. As a result, some countries in the world can be plunged into water because of the sea level rise. For instance, about one third of the Netherlands lies below sea level and they have been tried their best to keep the water out by different methods recently.
Secondly, it cannot be denied that fossil fuels are generally restricted and non-renewable as it takes millions of years to form. Therefore, the excessive utilization of these natural resources may result to run out of energy. The price, hence, will increase rapidly, which causes some countries all over the world fall into a fuel war. Besides, there will be a likelihood that human life will have to confront with a bunch of negative and detrimental impacts such as unemployment, poverty and starvation etc.
In conclusion, that fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas are now utilized can lead to unexpected consequences affecting human life. Therefore, in order to alleviate these environmental problems and energy crisis all over the world, the reduction in the fossil fuels use should be considered and planned purposefully buy International community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ceable drawbacks of this phenomenon. First of all, it is clearly seen that fo...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r out by different methods recently. Secondly, it cannot be denied that fossi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nemployment, poverty and starvation etc. In conclusion, that fossil fuels ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20440251572 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88937587367 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572327044025 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5797817982 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176777276675 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569462269994 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662657361965 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111070595634 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417995827688 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.