In recent years, there have been two opposing views on the impacts of international tourism. Some people assume that it is very rewarding, yet others voice concern about its adverse effects. As far as I am concerned, the downsides of tourism far outweigh its benefits, and as such it should be reasonably regulated.
On the one hand, there are two advantages of developing international tourism. The immediate ones are the improvements in infrastructure and new leisure amenities. Airports, road facilities and hotels have been continuously upgraded in order to keep pace with the rapidly growing tourist industry. Second, tourism can generate employment in local services such as entertainment, accommodation and catering for tourists. When a country receives tourists all over the world, its hotel industry, transportation, local business all flourishes. It will certainly revive the revenue resource of a country as well as generating huge employment opportunities. Accordingly, while the local unemployment rate decreases, the average standard of living of people increases.
On the other hand, its negative impacts on environment are irreversible. The damage to the local environment is the first price people need to pay for tourism. To cater to the tastes of the influx of tourists, host countries usually sacrifice the indigenous landscape for metropolitan facilities such as international hotel chains or global theme parks. In addition, tourism development puts pressure on natural resources. The overuse of water in tourist resorts, for instance, can result in water shortage in local areas. Even more disturbing, though, is the environment pollution that international tourism has caused in many parts of the world. In mountainous areas such as the Himalayas, trekking tourists and climbers leave behind their garbage and camping equipment. Such practices pollute the environment in remote areas with few disposal facilities.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that tourism boosts local economy, but this cannot be true if the explosive growth of tourism eventually leaves nothing but ruins for visitors to see. If uncontrolled, tourism will continue to take its toll on natural treasures, and these precious things cannot be restored once they have been spoiled. To prevent further destruction, it is imperative that governments lay down clear guiding principles regarding tourist industry.
- Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs therefore it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 92
- It is a common aspiration among many young people to run their own business. Rather than work for an employer.Do you think the advantages of working for yourself overweigh the drawbacks? 89
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sport for younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- now a days more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face it is a positive or a negative development 81
- Some people believe that longer prison sentences are the best way to decrease crime while others believe that there are alternative ways to decrease crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59178082192 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11037947832 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605479452055 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4083217666 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1904761905 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.380952381 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38095238095 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125999402754 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375139078121 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037875914296 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781983272649 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202601894259 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59178082192 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11037947832 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605479452055 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4083217666 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1904761905 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.380952381 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38095238095 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125999402754 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375139078121 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037875914296 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781983272649 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202601894259 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.