International travel brings benefits to travelers and countries visited, but it also causes problems for the environment. Do the disadvantages outweigh the advantages? Give your own opinion and relevant examples.
International travel is trending all over since quite some time now, because of more awareness about travel destinations and cheap travel options. However, excessive tourist numbers have been known to wreck the natural beauty of these tourist destinations, proving that international tourism is more harmful to the environment.
The first reason why I say this is because when tourists go to a place of natural beauty, let’s say Mauritius, they flock to its beautiful beaches, for which the country is famous. However, there have been cases of littering observed by many tourists day by day, due to eating out or while driving around, and this makes keeping the beach and surrounding areas clean, more difficult. I believe this happens because the tourists have no sense of belonging to that place since it’s not their homeland. Apart from this, they take it for granted that famous holiday destinations are obviously being maintained by the government, so even if they spoil it, it will be taken care of by the authorities.
A second reason to support my view is that if tourist spots are visited a lot, the natural solitude of the place gets disturbed. An example to support this statement is the cable car facilities in the Swiss Alps region. Before tourists might have started swarming the Alps, there would have been no noises and constructions that obstruct the natural landscape pattern. But after the place got popular, the authorities had to build a ropeway system for tourist activities. The frequent noise of the tourists and skiing and mountain climbing disturbed the peace of the area, enabling the natural wildlife to stay away from there and seek shelters elsewhere.
Citing the above mentions examples I would conclude by saying that as more and more tourists explore the holiday destinations, the natural habitat of these places gets altered to accommodate more people. Seeing that international travel is growing day by day, it is definitely causing more harm to the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-27 | AdamRahimov | 92 | view |
- Entertainment 84
- Protect wild animals 56
- car and pollution 73
- Some people believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- By investing in tourism we can earn a lot of revenue and growth in national economy.At the same time it destroys the local culture. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tourists'' or 'tourist's'?
Suggestion: tourists'; tourist's
...een cases of littering observed by many tourists day by day, due to eating out or while ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15548780488 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72344508082 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579268292683 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.7539652485 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.076923077 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.088900062476 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367651852914 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588804922719 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682375537588 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549731998573 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.