International travel can make people prejudiced rather than broad minded. Why people fail to benefit when they travel? What we can do to improve their understanding of the countries they visit?
Many people desire to expand their minds and enrich their experiences of the world during a visit to their dream tourist destination. However, instead of feeling the pleasure of travel, what some sightseers feel are only cultural prejudice, conflicts and misunderstandings. There are several reasons for this tendency and steps which could be taken to deepen visitors’ knowledge of the country they want to set foot on.
The first and foremost reason why people hold unfavourable views of the hosts is due to diverse customs and deeply rooted cultural concepts. An obvious example is that eating cow meat is permissible and understandable in Vietnam. However, Indian people might be quite amazed and outraged when hearing or seeing cow meat edible, for it is illicit to butcher cows in their country. Another reason causing the problem is stereotyping, which results mostly from bad experiences with street vendors and petty thieves. It is prevalent in Vietnam for foreign travellers to be blatantly ripped off when they buy things from locals; or their mobile phones might be snatched while sitting in a cramped bus.
Several methods should be adopted to help tourists minimize the potential cultural bias or untrue concepts. Primarily, before paying a visit to one tourist destination, it is a need to accumulate a basic understanding of customs and local people’s lifestyle to avoid culture shocks. Moreover, efforts should be made by those tourist guides or mass media to disseminate local cultures and popularize some relevant taboos. In this sense, foreign visitors will acquire the first-hand knowledge and thus have a deeper insight into the host community. Additionally, the authority should restrict street vendors or strengthen the security in those areas so that local inhabitants have to sell commodities at fixed prices.
In conclusion, there are two primary factors that make tourist have a negative attitude towards the place they visit. However, proper measures can be prompted to tackle the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | vinitpatel | 67 | view |
| 2018-08-20 | Sherrysh | 84 | view |
| 2018-04-15 | phuongdiem249 | 78 | view |
| 2017-06-10 | MinhNgoc 299 | 89 | view |
| 2017-06-09 | lananh311a | 76 | view |
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also a social life Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with Discuss both view and give your opinion 77
- Art classes such as painting and drawing are as important for children s development as other subjects so it should be compulsory in high school Do you agree or disagree 82
- International travel can make people prejudiced rather than broad minded. Why people fail to benefit when they travel? What we can do to improve their understanding of the countries they visit? 89
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them? 89
- (08/11/2014) Some people believe that crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of bad person’s nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.346875 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84744780187 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634375 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9774111249 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.066666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184066422091 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536543898808 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441979668099 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113936239058 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484932717035 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.