The internet allows us to stay connected with each other no matter where we are. On the other hand, it also isolates us and encourages people not to socialise.
In today’s modern world, with the development of technology, we are able to communicate with people around the globe. However, some people assert that this advanced technology will not benefit us, in return, it will cause harmful effects on the way people socialise. Thus, we will examine both sides of the argument before reaching a reasonable conclusion.
Undoubtedly, people nowadays get benefited due to the advancement in technology, for example, internet. It allows people to communicate with others more easily and in a convenient manner. In the past days, the way people used to communicate was far more troublesome and time-consuming than that in the present day. That is, people could only write letters or send telegrams to keep in touch with their friends or relatives who live in the other part of the world. Nevertheless, internet which is available these days provides an opportunity for people to stay connected with others through social media like Facebook or email. Not forgetting to mention that, it only takes about a second for delivery and receive by their friends or family. Therefore, it is apparent that internet gives a golden chance to people worldwide to communicate with others which is impossible to achieve during the past decades.
On the other hand, there is always another side of a coin. The internet is believed to have detrimental side effects on the ability of people to socialise. To begin, internet at home causes the inhabitants of a city to stay at home whenever they are free. This kind of habit will cause them to lose the interpersonal skill which is crucial and should be mastered by every individual in their lives. They should, for instance, take part in youth or sports activities so that they can meet new friends and develop the socialising skill. If they do not learn how to communicate with others in face-to-face conversations, they are less likely to achieve success in their jobs which require the sophisticated communicating skills. Hence, it is clearly shown that people may eventually lose the ability of socialising if they overuse the internet.
In conclusion, the internet brings numerous advantages and disadvantages to our lives. However, I believe that we should spend our time wisely on using the internet as it can be more beneficial provided we do not overuse it and we should learn to socialise face-to-face rather than bury their heads into the screens of electronic gadgets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-20 | sashwini50 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | caochau1310 | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-12 | kiranbhai | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-01 | catmandu | 56 | view |
| 2017-10-30 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 86 | view |
- Besides a lot of advantages, some people believe that the Internet creates many problems. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 76
- Besides a lot of advantages, some people believe that the Internet creates many problems. 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy since 1980 with projections until 2030. 84
- If the paper from every morning edition of the nation’s largest newspaper were collected and rendered into paper pulp that the newspaper could reuse, about 5 million trees would be saved each year. This kind of recycling is unnecessary, however, since t 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a convenient manner" with adverb for "convenient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...communicate with others more easily and in a convenient manner. In the past days, the way people used ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09158415842 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87161465356 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534653465347 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2883778457 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.263157895 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256270951392 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807021635114 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594617841369 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142418999182 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536576838005 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.