The Internet is now used around the world as a source of information and communication. However, its content is often controversial, so many people think its needs to be controlled. Others believe there should be no interference whatsoever.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the light of the proliferation of technology, the Internet has been utilized worldwide as the primary means for users to approach information and keep in touch with their relatives in different geographical locations. Notwithstanding its enormous benefits, there have been many hot-debated discussions over whether the content appearing on cyberspace should be carefully verified in advance by the authorities or allowed complete freedom.
The advocates of Internet censorship tend to argue that erroneous and inappropriate information could potentially put people’s lives at risk. Obviously, there have been increasingly pornographic and drug-selling posts and ads on giant media platforms, including Facebook and YouTube. These harmful contents are ubiquitous and likely to turn naïve users into victims of drug addiction and sexual abuse. Another reason is that, without Internet restrictions, fraudsters can artfully and secretly access the users’ confidential information, such as credit card passwords or suggestive pictures, by enticing them into filling forms, which are claimed to offer them exclusive gifts in return. Consequently, their money would be stolen, and sensitive information even is used to blackmail them later.
On the one hand, others perceive regulating the Internet to be an invasion of their rights and privacy. These individuals suppose that they should be allowed to have a complete insight into domestic and foreign affairs regardless of the accuracy level of the information, which, in their opinion, would be evaluated by themselves. Also, from a financial perspective, managing and executing Internet regulation would require plenty of resources allocated for state-of-the-art technology and experts; the extent of effectiveness, however, is not entirely guaranteed. The extravagant expenditures on this process, thereby, are deemed to be spent on other essential social fields, such as education and healthcare.
Having all aspects considered conscientiously, restricting the range of information on the Internet is an imperative action that authority entities should take into consideration. However, it is advised to be done based on Internet users’ rights, needs, benefits, and privacy.
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing What factors contribute to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers 89
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing What factors contribute to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers 89
- The Internet is now used around the world as a source of information and communication However its content is often controversial so many people think its needs to be controlled Others believe there should be no interference whatsoever Discuss both views 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ds, such as education and healthcare. Having all aspects considered conscienti...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93209876543 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25652241995 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645061728395 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5312337598 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.846153846 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192887572118 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657492639934 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044628697792 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114595685437 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239453257995 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.41 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.