The Internet provides us with information about life and cultures of different countries, and some people say it is not necessary to visit these countries to learn about them. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples.
The trend of exploring foriegn cultures is gaining prevalence in this era of globalization. Presently, it is argued that information about cultures and lifestyles of other countries is provided by internet and therefore the need to travel abroad in order to have familiarity with foriegn cultures is no longer of that importance. This essay intends to disagree with the given statement.
To commence with, unlike internet, travelling overseas allows individuals to accumulate practical experience of lifestyle and cultural values. To demonstrate, people can experience food, weather, wearing styles and ways of enjoyment practically while spending time in abroad. They are exposed to cultural values, rituals and their origins in such a way they can feel the importance and beauty of such values. Adding to it, quality time spent with foreigners, having interactions helps in understanding the behavior, mentality and their perspectives towards life. On the contrary, internet provides only informations that are sometimes, beyond realities what we experience while getting into the situations.
It is, therefore, observed that visiting abroad is an idea to be prioritized over informations collected through internet as far as knowing about foriegn cultures is concerned.
Further emphasizing on my point of view, people can have deep insights into cultural background and historical facts derived from the essence of a country while visiting other countries. To make it clear, the reality of history, grassroots of cultural values and ancestral inheritance can be witnessed by exploring to historical tourist attractions and other prominent places. On the other hand, internet may provide detailed informations but the experience gained from realities exposed is something that brings deeper understanding of a culture. Needless to say, travelling holds an extra edge over internet in case of knowing about foriegn cultures.
To recapitulate, undeniably, internet opens the window to the foriegn cultures. However, I firmly believe that visiting foriegn countries is the most effective way to have knowledge about the foreign cultures.
|2020-12-20||Justin||84||Read full essay|
- Some people are convinced that mature age employees are beneficial to a company. Others think that younger employees contribute more and hence more beneficial to a company. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.78
- Nowadays more and more children acquire unhealthy eating habits Why is it happening What can be done to solve this issue71
- Some people believe that study is important tosuccess, others say there is no relationbetween study and success. Discuss both views.Give your own opinion based on your93
- Some people think that a car is the best way to travel in cities while others believe a bicycle is a better way. Discuss both views and give your opinion.80
- Do the dangers derived from the use of chemicals in food production and preservation outweigh the advantages38
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...about foriegn cultures is concerned. Further emphasizing on my point of view, people...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7125 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04183718129 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571875 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4627564301 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.866666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264067286584 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883165691122 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588900064953 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15012552853 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614737027982 0.056905535591 108% => OK
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.