The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication by many. However, there are others who would argue that it is actually destroying our communication skills. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
In this contemporary era, technology is revolutionising every aspect of life. Advancement in communication is one such example. So many people think that internet made communication much more easier. However, people like academicians, student argue that because of the invention, the communication skill is becoming ruining. As both viewpoints have merits, I tend to believe that if this tool is used properly it could be more beneficial to the society.
At this era of globalisation, as internet is becoming ubiquitous, it has enormous contribution in uplifting the communication problems. It facilitates fields such as banking, business promotions, entertainment, travel ticket bookings etc. Now people have the option of net banking where exorbitant amount of money can be transferred from one account to another with intervention of face to face communication. In addition, most of the multinational companies have clients scatter all over the world. It is not possible to visit door to door to sell a product rather owners can talk to their potential clients over Skype and discuss about their ideas over Skype or email which help in promoting their business. Nowadays booking tickets has become so easy that people do not need to spend their precious time standing the queues. From choosing the desirable destination to booking hotels, all can be done in a snap of fingers. Also internet has lessened the communication problem due to distance. There are so many platforms have been invented by which one can easily talk to his family and friends who do not live at the same place.
Contradicting to these boons, online communication has some advert effects as well. Many business people complaint about poor connection of internet due to which effective communication confronts many hindrance. Academicians as well as students say that this type of communication is destroying their concentration. Consequently, their academic excellence is becoming waning gradually. Some youngsters are so addicted to online communication that they prefer to stay online and chat which opposed to going out with family and making friends. Thus, online communication is reducing the scope of face to face communication.
To recapitulate, internet is the best way to communicate as it saves time to great extent. According to me, every innovation has some drawbacks but it is our responsible to use the internet in a positive way and not using it in negative way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-22 | mrittika1993dey@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result i a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is impor 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries include a relatively large number of young adults, comparatively with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweighs the disadvantages 73
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents an 73
- Some people feel that boarding schools are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 73
- The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication by many. However, there are others who would argue that it is actually destroying our communication skills. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...k that internet made communication much more easier. However, people like academicians, stu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'door to'.
Suggestion: door to
... the world. It is not possible to visit door to door to sell a product rather owners can talk t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 926, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
..., all can be done in a snap of fingers. Also internet has lessened the communication...
^^^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...e communication has some advert effects also. Many business people complaint about p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hindrance seems to be countable; consider using: 'many hindrances'.
Suggestion: many hindrances
...which effective communication confronts many hindrance. Academicians as well as students say t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...icate as it saves time to great extent. According to me, every innovation has some drawbacks bu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... is our responsible to use the internet in a positive way and not using it in negative way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, thus, well, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.3376753507 300% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32133676093 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18744920105 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565552699229 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0716212829 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0909090909 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6818181818 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166443973049 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526532838741 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442999009336 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10718038271 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343229052357 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.