It is beneficial for both employers and employees if employees are given longer holidays away from work. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In this competitive generation, everyone is more focused on obtaining the best results at work, be it be an employer or an employee. Some believe that, it is better for employers to grant longer leaves to their workers, to increase their efficiency and productivity at work. I partially agree with this notion, as long time away from work can also be detrimental to the companies. This essay will explain my point of view with relevant examples.
Firstly, the productivity of a company completely relies in the way the employees function. And for them to not get strained from excessive workload, they need to be provided with breaks to overcome the stress load. For instance, a survey conducted by some researchers in the US, showed higher efficiency at work by employees and greater success rates of companies that provide a month long annual leave.
Such long leaves, help to boost up energy and enhance the performance of employees.
Secondly, due working overtime most of the company workers rarely get personal time for socializing, and they end up suffering from various health issues both physically and mentally. This has proved to negatively impact their work performance and eventually has proved to be harmful to the companies. As a healthy mind lies in a healthy body, providing the workers time off work can help them rejuvenate and this ultimately improves their work output.
Nevertheless, we should not overlook how staying long time away from work can influence the employees. For example, it takes a longer time for people to settle into the workplace once away from work for longer periods.
To recapitulate, for better performance and good productivity, employers should provide holiday time to their employees, keeping in mind the time limits for such vacations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-02 | naheemah779 | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | naheemah779 | 67 | view |
- It is beneficial for both employers and employees if employees are given longer holidays away from work To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- It is beneficial for both employers and employees if employees are given longer holidays away from work To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14383561644 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81587662966 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565068493151 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0473045215 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.285714286 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27950250653 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958943531052 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514897095994 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130547301612 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717578753655 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.