It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Firstly, population aging creates the shortage of young-labor supply, the prominent resources with each country in the context of globalization boosted by the vastly accelerated pace of technological development. Young labors have the intelligence of quick adaptation, a necessary skills to accommodate with the immensely broaden of advance knowledge. Besides, they have internally the creative morale to invent fresh ideas which are the incentive of social development. However, these ideas may be exhausted if, in society, the older make up the majority. The high portion of elders, although they have vast wisdom in the fields they have served, cannot sustain the ability to contribute to the extraordinary thoughts hence fail in adapt with the continuous-changing science and more impossible making technological surplus value.
Secondly, the increase in the number of elders raises the burden of social about the problems related to social welfare as oldster’s health, social housing, social assurance… The most common problem, oldster-caring health, is developing into challenging math having no result in many countries, especially developing countries. The number of older people accelerated increasing pressure to the hospitals in designing healthy programming embracing healthcare infrastructure, high-quality healthcare services, and the most complex is the adequacy of medical forces. Not only the oldster’s health problems, social assurance, and social housing are complicated to clear up. For instance, because of the life-changing pace, descendants have the least time to cherish about their elderlies in the family drive to the excessive risks having chances to take place, thus, governments call on building up a communal housing system to concentrate older people to straightforward administration. However, not every government has monetary resources to take care of this obstacle and thrust the circumstances in which older people do not have anyone care about more serious.
In conclusion, population organization is the international problems causing serious consequences to the development. Nations in the world, for the, thrive of global, need to care about this issue together to reconcile the life of the older the development of the younger.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-24 | kakaloc1681998 | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-29 | nguyenthaohien98 | 56 | view |
- You are entering a writing competition in your local newspaper. You must write about an important person in history who you admire. 70
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on publictransport systems. 11
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why dowe need music? Is the traditional music of a country more importantthan the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 56
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 76
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems What are the problems What could be done to solve those problems 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'skill'?
Suggestion: skill
...igence of quick adaptation, a necessary skills to accommodate with the immensely broad...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le making technological surplus value. Secondly, the increase in the number of ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t have anyone care about more serious. In conclusion, population organization i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
... development. Nations in the world, for the, thrive of global, need to care about th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82089552239 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30128740827 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.3756372016 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.5 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9166666667 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117513399312 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405037142157 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330619732326 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682371503652 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280065848098 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.